Photographing oil paintings for the web

11 02 2008

Thanks to my niece Molly, a talented artist in her own right, for inspiring this blog post:

So you have a nice little painting you’ve just completed, but none the photographs you took do it justice. How can you get decent photos for your website? I am certainly no expert photographer, but I will share what I do for my own website to produce decent reproductions of flat art for online display.

Photographing artwork is definitely a little tricky. If the artwork has any sheen at all, any flash or angled light can cause glare on the surface, which will distract or obscure the true nature of the picture. These days, I use a digital camera for all of my photography and tend to do a fair amount of color correction in Photoshop. But I used the same method of photography I will describe below, even in the pre-digital age when I made slides of my work. 

The best conditions I’ve found for photographing artwork is outside on a bright but cloudy day. This gives consistent diffused light and the least amount of glare. If photographing on a sunny day, try to set your painting up at the edge of a shaded area so that enough light reaches the painting without shining directly on it. Tree shade isn’t good because of the dappling. It needs to be even light, so maybe an overhang on the side of a building or something.

If you are shooting film or are otherwise not able to correct the camera angle after the fact, you’ll need to make sure your canvas is as perpendicular to the camera as possible. You can either set it up on an easel or hang it on a wall on the side of a building if the overhang isn’t too large. To avoid the fish-eye effect that can occur because of a wide-angle lens curve, you should set your camera up on a tripod far enough away from the painting and zoom all the way in on your painting to fill the lens as best you can with the picture. This will minimize that fish-eye distortion. (Thanks to artists David Darrow, James Abbott and others in the Daily Painters Discussion group for this and other technical tips!)  

When photographing, I use my camera’s manual setting so that I can set the white balance and bracket the exposures, just in case what I’m seeing in the viewfinder isn’t what I get on my computer screen. Then I’ll examine all of these images in Photoshop, and with the painting sitting next to me, I’ll make adjustments to the chosen image in brightness, contrast, color, etc. Photoshop is great also for correcting the picture if the painting doesn’t look exactly square. But Photoshop is also $$$ so if you don’t already have it, you might look for a cheaper image editing software program that can do most of these basic corrections.

For the web, I will overlay my copyright info and save my images as 72 dpi JPEGs. For archiving, though, I save the image at the largest size my camera setting will allow, and save it as a TIFF. JPEGs are fine for web stuff, but not great for archiving because it is a “lossy” image format. This means that every time the JPEG is opened it looses a bit of information, even if it is a large file. For any kind of high quality reproduction (such as giclee prints), the best option is to have the painting professionally scanned or photographed at a very high resolution.

Site Search Tags:, , , , , , , , , , ,
[?]
Share This



Jennifer Young; Vibrant Landscapes
Oil Paintings and Art Prints Online
My Website
Subscribe to my newsletter
Subscribe to my blog
Contact Me!

Actions

Informations

3 responses to “Photographing oil paintings for the web”

11 02 2008
Rick Nilson (21:40:46) :

Jennifer,

Thanks for the post on photo’s. Some of this stuff I knew but I did not relate specifically to posting art on the web. I have been hesitant to “doctor” any of my paintings for fear that what I posted is not what the painting actually looks like. I am a bit color blind so it seems like a shot in the dark. Your posts have changed the way I paint and now the way I photo it. An example of how I “doctored” a painting is posted on my website. Note today’s painting, “Rooster by the Palms” and let me know what you think. Thanks again. Your fan

Rick Nilson

11 02 2008
jennifereyoung (23:51:06) :

Hi Rick,
Thanks for your comments. I guess I call what I do to the photo in Photoshop color matching or color correcting rather than doctoring. In many cases, the camera will distort things like contrast, color temperature, etc., and the main thing I do in Photoshop is to make adjustments to these distortions so that the resulting image is as close to the original painting as I can get it.

Of course, monitors will vary from location to location, so you can never be sure what your image will look like on someone else’s computer. But if I can at least get it to look true to the painting on my calibrated monitor, I think it has a better chance of looking decent elsewhere.

11 07 2008
Sue (00:43:00) :

I have been asked to make images of abut 25 paintings which are hanging in a gallery. There is excellent gallery lighting. Some of the works are very large.
Any ideas on how to do this?.
Some are framed, some block mounted and many behind glass.
I have practiced and the images do not have parallel sides and the colour is wrong.

Thanks for your comments. (Sorry, no external links in the comment area.)

You can use these tags : <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>




Close
E-mail It